On Creativity, Credit, and the Popular Idol

My wife is watching American Idol. As you can tell, I am not. I don’t strictly loathe the program; I just really, really don’t like it.

I’m aware it’s a very popular little show. Not just my wife watches it, apparently; there’s a guy at work who mentioned in passing as well. And, as long I’m being honest with you all, I don’t actually mind the talent on display, even if it does seem like a grossly overblown, shameless televised debutante ball for people with a little more lung than the rest of us.

The key thing for me is, what talent exactly is on display? There is something indeed unique and special about the contestants on American Idol (at least, those that make it through the first few rounds). Whether they’ve got a Dave Grohl grin or don’t care two whits about their audience, most of the people up on that stage share a common talent: their voice. They are, for the most part, good singers. Some are great, and would be at home on Broadway, or at the opera.

And I am a huge fan of musical talent. Alfred Brendel, Yo-Yo Ma and Isaac Stern are unparalleled to this day (and I am quite fortunate to have a recording of Brahms’ chamber music with most of these fellows playing). Joe Satriani and Eddie Van Halen can shred like none other. Mike Portnoy is an astonishing drummer, and hey – love him or hate him Axel Rose can sing. These are all exceptionally talented musicians, performers who rank in the top 1% of their art. But – and here is the argument’s focus – how far does their credit and fame extend?

As much as I enjoy consuming media (books, music, movies, etc.), I also create it as well. I am by training a musician and a composer. I am by my own hand a writer. And I have made a couple of terrible home movies. And whether it is in poring over the score of Beethoven’s sixth symphony, or marveling at the poetry of Dickens’ words, or admiring the artistry of Coppola’s Dracula, it is always driven home to me the intense passion, the sweat and tears, the frustration and the determination, that these artists have invested in their work.

Think, for a moment, about the song you’re listening to. Is it three, four, five minutes long? How long did it take to write, rehearse, perform and record that music? Chances are, several months. Production began last year on The Hobbit, which is due for release this Christmas. And the script was in the works ten years ago. Stephen King began work on his Dark Tower series in 1975 and is still working on it today. These are creations of human imagination, and while many of us have wild fantasies, stories and songs that run through our hears, these few are the ones with the bravery, the foolishness, and the love of self-immolation to commit those fantasies to permanence.

Yet in all of this, music – and specifically popular music – stands alone in several ways from all others. I won’t comment on the idea that pop songs are created for money; all art is, in one form or another. Nor will I say anything about the formulaic characteristic that defines most pop music; how many Agatha Christie clones are out there in the literary world?

No, the one thing that I can’t help but notice – the one thing that frustrates me to no end, and drives to to tears to think of it – is the credit given to the creators of these works. What springs to mind when I say The Hobbit, Vertigo, Titanic, Alien, Dune, or The Pit and the Pendulum? More likely than not, J.R.R. Tolkien, Alfred Hitchcock, James Cameron, Ridley Scott, Frank Herbert and Edgar Allen Poe. Yet if I ask you who wrote any one of Britney Spears’ eleven Top 10 songs, how many of you would be able to answer, Max Martin?

Turns out, Max Martin wrote chart-topping songs for The Backstreet Boys, NSYNC, Kelly Clarkson, Pink, Katy Perry, and even Usher. Now I don’t typically listen boy bands, pop rock or hip hop. Not out of any sense of pride – it just doesn’t speak to me. My tastes do vary – anything from The Cure and The Sisters of Mercy to Iron Maiden and Napalm Death, along with more or less the entire canon of western classical music from the 1600s on. It wasn’t until recently, however, that I started to wonder why I was attracted to these styles of music in particular. The answer that came to me, ultimately, was art. These musical styles represent art in its highest form. Like looking at a Picasso or reading Jules Verne, through the art you are in touch with the artist, and you have the chance, if you slow down, to marvel at every brush stroke, or wonder how the writer chose their words, and why they hold such magic.

When I listen to Porcupine Tree (one of my favorite bands), I don’t just hear the music. I hear Steven Wilson, writer, producer, singer, performer, making sure every single sound I hear is there on purpose, for me to recognize and revel in. I imagine him sitting in a studio, expensive headphones on, changing the reverb from 5 milliseconds to 6 milliseconds, smiling, and thinking – that’s perfect.

I wonder if Britney Spears ever does that.

In classical music, the composer is prized above all else, even the performer. “Simon Rattle conducts Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony” – the work of art belongs to the composer.

In film, it is the director, though the producer, screenwriter, and composer are all credited as well; “Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey.”

In literature – surprise – the author.

And even in contemporary popular music – rock, rap, jazz, punk, metal, house and hip-hop – it is rarely questioned that the artist and songwriter are not the same. We assume that Kurt Cobain had some hand in writing the music and lyrics to Smells Like Teen Spirit. Even Flo Rida wrote “Good Feeling” (under his real name of Tramar Dillard). So what happened to generic-brand pop? When did the performers begin to overshadow the creators?

So I won’t cry shame on American Idol; after all, showcasing talent is (ostensibly) what the show is all about. I have no problem with a nobody from Arkansas being given a shot at fame. But spare a thought for the songwriters who gave their lives to make this happen. Continue to give them credit as you sing.

And who knows? Maybe one day we’ll have a talent show for songwriters and composers. Admittedly, it would be a lot less fun to watch. But it would certainly be more interesting.

Is there hope yet left in the romantic world?

Romance is an odd concept. It suggests and implies a great many things, from the palpitations of infatuation, the surreptitiousness of forbidden relations, to the turbulent impetuosity of lust. There are romance novels, romantic comedies, romantic getaways and romantic restaurants. But it seems to me that, in what I see around me every day, romance has come to equal love.

And, as we all know, love equals lust.

Stop me if you disagree, but I rarely, if ever, find myself coming across a story in literature or film of recent years that does not feature some, if not excessive, amounts of sex. I love Stephen King, but the guy is obsessed with it. Most titles billed as romantic comedies seemed to follow a fairly prescribed storyline in which two lead characters begin their relationship by sleeping with one another, and thereafter finding some mutual attraction (though even this rarely seems to progress beyond the physical). Even movies that are epic and dramatic in their scope and concept seem unable to pull themselves away from this theme. I think of Titanic, which was in every way a magnificent film, and draws the viewer in from the outset and doesn’t let go to the very end. But – and it’s a big but that I’m sure some will disagree with me on – the sex scene in the car puts a very different slant on the movie. It is iconic, of course, if for nothing but the cinematography, and is arguably indispensable to the plot – it marks the commitment of the ending of her relationship with her fiancé, and the beginning of a new life with Leonardo DiCaprio. However, what does it imply for their relationship? Do the characters genuinely love each other, or is their relationship driven primarily by lust? The sexuality is implicit almost from the very beginning, and is of course strongest in the sketch scene. Is this, then, a romantic story at all?

Rewind 150 years (or even 100, for that matter), and the notion of romance is markedly different. The very age is known in artistic circles as the Romantic era, and the definition of the term meant something quite different. Consider these two definitions:

1. a feeling of excitement and mystery associated with love.

2.  a quality or feeling of mystery, excitement, and remoteness from everyday life.

The term ‘romance’ used to have little to do with love, and implied much more the welcoming of sentiment and personalism into the arts. In fact, it closely resembles another term we have come to use much more frequently: fantasy. There is a great deal of love in many of the best-known fantasies, but very few of them are sexual in any manner whatsoever. There was a love between Frodo and Sam greater than any more recent romance I have come across, with – and I’ll get there in a moment – a few exceptions.

Perhaps with the commodification of our very sentiments and feelings (I’m looking at you, Valentine’s Day!), it is simply easier to equate love, lust and romance to a single common denominator; if there is no difference between them, stories, perfumes and candies can all be reigned into the same arena. And to me this is a tragedy – there is a danger in this of losing love, and romance, as distinct entities in their own right, that may be connected to, but need having nothing to do with, lust and sexuality. Love can exist without sex, but it is inherent to lust.

So where am I going with this? Well, to tell you the truth, I was going to have stopped here. I will admit to having formed a prejudice against virtually all modern love stories along these veins, and – particularly with the recent spate of terrible, terrible love-themed movies whose posters I have been unable to avoid – I had more or less given up hope that there was yet room in the world for stories that could equal Romeo and Juliet focus on love, exploring the themes therein, without being led astray by the temptation of lust.

But, then I started thinking a little bit more. Were there stories, films, that I had come across recently that lived up to this notion? And I began to realize that my prejudice had in fact blinded me from recognizing love in its most enduring form in many recent productions. One of my favorite movies of all time, WALL•E, is a perfect example. Ironically, so is Up, which followed this. Both of these are tales of love as a connection, a commitment made unconsciously by the very fact that this person is someone you cannot live without. Up plays on this notion and turns it into a minor tragedy, and I will admit brought me to tears when I first saw it.

Another great example is the film Love Actually, from a few years back. Although being largely billed as a seasonal romantic comedy, what struck me is that in its attempt to consolidate several unrelated stories of love, the writers were daring enough to tackle love in many different ways. There is the aging rock musician who realizes the love of his life is his manager; the childish crush of the intern on the Prime Minister; the wonderfully ironic twist on lust with the sex actors who in fact want nothing more than to get to know each other. However, my favorite relationship in this film is that between Liam Neeson and his stepson, which does an excellent job of tracing the building of a strong, loving relationship between an adult and a child.

So with these thoughts in mind, I wondered what the rest of the world thought. And, with little true hope, it must be said, I thought I should see what the IMDB lists as the top 10 romance movies of all time. See what you think – I was surprised:

  1. Casablanca
  2. Rear Window
  3. Forrest Gump
  4. City Lights
  5. North by Northwest
  6. Modern Times
  7. Vertigo
  8. Amélie
  9. WALL•E
  10. Life is Beautiful (La Vita è Bella)

My first thought was, I didn’t realize Hitchcock made so many romantic movies. My second was, this isn’t so bad. Though there may be sex in some of these films, not one of them is driven by lust. There is something deeper, something genuinely meaningful (in the vaguest of senses), in each one of these films. And for me, that was an encouraging thought.

So I’ll finish with a quote from one of my favorite bands of all time, My Dying Bride. As you might suspect by now, it has nothing to do with lust:

As I draw up my breath

And silver fills my eyes

I kiss her still

For she will never rise

On my weak body

Lays her dying hand

Through those meadows of Heaven

Where we ran

Like a thief in the night

The wind blows so light

It wars with my tears

That won’t dry for many years

Love’s golden arrow

At her should have fled

And not Death’s ebon dart

To strike her dead.

For My Fallen Angel, from Like Gods of the Sun
My Dying Bride, 1996